This video introduces promissory estoppel, where a party may be liable for a promise made without return consideration where th. Nov. 19761 VARIATION, WAIVER AND ESTOPPEL-A RE-APPRAISAL 68 1 to deal with the problem of absence of consideration in such situations has been to develop the doctrine of equitable or promissory estoppel.' Neither the precise requirements nor the effect of the doctrine appear to be settled. An alteration of position in reliance (Ajayi v Briscoe). Promissory estoppel is a cause of action that might be asserted against a party for the first party's detrimental reliance upon a promise from the second party. Defense of promissory estoppel can be used by promise only against the promiser to enforce the promise, not by promise. A party acting in reliance on a promise made by the Government if has altered his position, is entitled to enforce the promise against the Government, even though the promise is not in the form of a formal contract as required by Article 299 and that article does not militate against the applicability of the doctrine of promissory estoppel against the Government. consideration, and substitutes instead the contract principles of the civil law (which are not based on the fundamental doctrine of consideration at all). Promissory estoppel is a term in the common law doctrine that is used by courts to implement promises made and consequently relied upon. Some may contend that it is unnecessary to have promissory estoppel since consideration will suffice for justice; there are also economic arguments that extra costs may be involved to disclaim promissory intentions in a gratuitous promisei. A promise must normally be in a deed (legal agreement or contract) or supported by consideration to be enforced. The most widely accepted definition of the doctrine of promissory estoppel is that set forth in section 90 of the Restatement of Contracts: Other Promises that are binding without consideration --Promise to perform a contract that was previously voidable by the promisor (child reaffirming at 18). 4. The doctrine of equitable estoppel prohibits (estops) someone from withdrawing a representation (or an act amounting . Promissory Estoppel. No Promissory Estoppel Where Employee Bargained to Work for Annual Salary Raises Indeed, Central London Property Trust involved an agreement of a landlord to accept a reduced rent from the defendant compared to that which it was entitled under their agreement for the duration of the Second World War. Promissory estoppel is like a contract, in that it requires a promise, but it may be found even without the formalities of a contract. A clear and unequivocal promise to suspend existing contractual rights. Promissory estoppel is a doctrine which provides that, under certain circumstances, a person should be liable for breaking a promise, even if we don't have all the elements necessary to form a contract.. Its origins are still shrouded in mystery, [87] and its functions, of which there are many, [88] are ill-defined. (1) Wright v. The ingredients of Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, must be satisfied with the implementation of the doctrine in India, as the law of estoppel is a rule of evidence. No Promissory Estoppel Where Employee Bargained to Work for Annual Salary Raises It can be invoked when a promisor has made a promise to a promisee who then relies on that promise to his subsequent detriment. Promissory Estoppel's application can invalidate the constitutional provision provided under Article 299, which talks about immunity granted against the personal accountability of an individual making the promise. 3.7.1.1 The Bargain Theory of Contracts and the Reliance Principle Introduction. 1 Since the decision of the High Court of Australia in Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher the application of promissory estoppel as a cause of action has prompted judicial support for a unified doctrine of equitable estoppel, which encompasses both . The seller's consideration is the money the buyer promises to pay for the equipment. Answer (1 of 3): Unjust enrichment is a doctrine that says that one cannot benefit from the services performed by another without providing some form of compensation regardless of whether there is liability for wrongdoing. Legally speaking, a contract is a legally binding agreement in law between at least two parties which is enforced by law or by binding arbitration if it covers the elements of a valid legal agreement [ 1] , while consideration is one of the key requirements for the creation of a contract, it is known as 'the price of a promise' . It is wider in scope than promissory estoppel and is not necessarily limited to being a defence. ARTICLE PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL DAMAGES Mary E. Becker* INTRODUCTION The proper measure of damages in promissory estoppel cases is a traditional subject of controversy.1 During the drafting of section 90 of the Restatement of Contracts,2 Professor Williston maintained that once a promise was enforced because a promisee had reasonably Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Century Realty Co. (1909) 220 Mo. Even in the absence of bargained-for exchange, a promise is enforceable if the following three elements are satisfied: 1) The promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance from the promisee; I. equitable estoppel, which estops certain defenses when one has made a misrepresentation as to past or present fact. Courts have been unwilling to confine contractual liability within the narrow limits of consideration doctrine. The consideration doctrine, regarded by many as the centerpiece of contract law, has produced a vast literature and intense controversy. What is Promissory Estoppel? Promissory estoppel commonly applies when a promise reasonably induces a predictable sort of action but without the more formal mutual consideration found in contracts. However, promissory estoppel would stop the creditor from asking for the rest of the money. The Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Shreya Dave ABSTRACT The Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel is an equitable doctrine evolved to avoid injustice and though commonly named Promissory Estoppel, it falls in the sphere of neither contract nor estoppel. 76. The consideration is the exchange of something of value between the parties at the time of entering into an agreement or making a promise. The necessity and desirability of the consideration requirement have been subject to debate. Promissory estoppel requires the person trying to enforce the promise proves these elements. If it can be shown by the Government that having regard to the facts as they have subsequently transpired, it would be inequitable to the Government to abide by the promise made by it, the court would not raise an equity in favor of the . The induced 'action or forbearance' works an estoppel against the promisor. 8. that is an unequivocal promise to found a promissory estoppel or conventional conduct of a sufficient clarity to found an estoppels by convention and, secondly, the objective basically prevents a party to a contract from acting in a certain way because they promised not to act in that way, and the other party to the contract relied on that promise and acted upon it. The scope of the doctrine of legitimate expectation is wider than promissory estoppel because it not only takes into consideration a promise made by a public body but also official practice, as well. Consideration, defined by Sir Frederick Pollock is, "An act or forbearance of one party, or the promise thereof, is the price for which the promise of the …show more content…. English law's current rule for the formation of a contract requires both consideration and an intention to create legal relations (ICLR). It is well suited to modern commercial practice and has had new life breathed into it by the Australian case Waltons Stores, in which Phang argued that it could be used to found a cause of action. In contract law, promissory estoppel is an exception to the requirement of consideration for a contract to be enforceable. Overview. (2) Theory of promissory estoppel. Facts: Promissory Estoppel case giving a principle of justice and equality. A party acting in reliance on a promise made by the Government if has altered his position, is entitled to enforce the promise against the Government, even though the promise is not in the form of a formal contract as required by Article 299 and that article does not militate against the applicability of the doctrine of promissory estoppel against the Government. Law-11-Consideration and Promissory Estoppel Terms in this set (25) consideration -a bargain for exchange between the parties -something of legal value given in exchange for a promise -each side of the contract gives something of legal value in order to be enforceable -ie. Remember, contracts require, among other things, consideration.By consideration, courts mean each party gives something and each party gets something in exchange. Often, this draconian necessity leads to inequity, and it It also does not make voluntary promises enforceable . ⇒ Thus, promissory estoppel is a situation where a promise is made, which is intended to bind and be acted upon, and has been acted upon (Bingham from the case of Central London Property v High Trees (1947)) - in such . Promissory Estoppel. --EXPRESS promise to pay debt that was discharged in bankruptcy 522, 119 S.W. Promissory Estoppel in Contract Law. Promissory estoppel is the idea that a promise can be enforced by the law if, after relying on that promise, the promisee is injured or suffers a resulting loss. Enforcing consistency. See Sec. a) Remedy is limited as justice requires (this is where expectations damages may come in if the injustice is great to not enforce them). This is referred to as equitable estoppel. In a general sense, Promissory Estoppel is a legal doctrine used in American law, which allows a party to recover on a promise, even if the promise was made without a formal consideration. According to Questions & Answers Law of Contract: Law Revision and Study Guide (Law Questions & Answers, Oxford University Press), by Adrian Chandler and Ian Brown, Promissory Estoppel may have the following meaning: see estoppel n. Promissory Estoppel is known by various names like - Equitable Estoppel, Quasi Estoppel and New Estoppel. This chapter examines the enforceability of promises, focusing on consideration and promissory estoppel. Legal consideration is a valuable asset that is. This stems from the assumption in English contract law that only bargains should be enforced. Promissory Estoppel as a Part of Contract Law Contract law generally requires that a person receive consideration for making a promise or agreement. Collier v P&MJ Wright: Arden LJ held that Foakes v Beer applied, but referring to the 'brilliant dictum' of Denning J in High Trees, held that promissory estoppel could aid Mr Collier. 6 c's nursing essay with consideration and promissory estoppel essay N the antiparallel direction. An example would be a party contracts to provide a service, but the contr. In this case, the promise relied on the promise of the promisor to his detriment however there was no valid contract because of lack of valid consideration under section 2(d). Promissory Estoppel is one of the elements of contract law that must be considered when drafting or entering into a contract or agreement. ⇒Promissory estoppel is an equitable principle ⇒ Estoppel is something that stops person X from doing something after person Y has relied upon the promise given to them. 2 . the principle of promissory estoppel states that when one party by his words or conduct makes a clear and unequivocal promise to another, with the intention to make a legal relationship in future, and with the intention or knowledge that the other party would act upon such a promise and it is in fact acted upon by the other party, then the party … (Woodhouse v Nigerian Produce). The seller's consideration is the money the buyer promises to pay for the equipment. 2. This law doctrine is usually used when there is no formal contract though the involved parties have acted as if there is such a contract. Promissory Estoppel The promissory estoppel doctrine is an exception to the requirement of consideration for contracts. INTRODUCTION The 'High Trees' estoppel accepted in Legione v Hateley has in more recent times developed into a formidable doctrine. In most cases, consideration is an important component of contracts. And third, the adoption of any legal principle such as promissory estoppel is more of a judicial prerogative than a legislative one. money, property, provision of services, forbearance of a right, etc Promissory Estoppel in United Kingdom Promissory Estoppel in Contract Law. Further, promissory estoppel does not override the requirement for consideration in contract law. common law rule about the need for consideration found in Pinnel's case • The doctrine of promissory estoppel has its origins in the case Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees Pty Ltd (1947) KB 130 London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees Pty Ltd [1947] (Promissory Estoppel as a shield) Facts: Central London Property Trust ( the landlord) owned a block of flats pictured above. Like all equitable remedies, it is discretionary, in contrast to the common law absolute right like right to damages for breach of contract. This Practice Note states the doctrine of estoppel, identifying its most common forms (estoppel by representation, estoppel by convention, promissory estoppel, proprietary estoppel, contractual estoppel), its use as a defence in litigation and the limited circumstances in which it can found a cause of action, its relationship . Promissory estoppel in relation to contract • Promissory estoppel (p.e.) Further, under the doctrine of PE, there may be a requirement to show detriment suffered by a party due to the reliance placed on its promise. Promissory estoppel is a legal doctrine. The induced 'action or forbearance' is the consideration for the promise. The requirements of estoppel (e.g. Estoppel—what, when and how to plead. The overall picture is thus confusing and confused. For using promissory estoppel as a sword the doctrine of consideration should be followed. Promissory estoppel elements The idea of promissory estoppel is that the promisor is barred from arguing that the underlying promise at the heart of the case should not be legally upheld. Promissory estoppel does not provide a replacement of the doctrine of consideration. Promissory estoppel is triggered when one party acts on the other party's promise. The plaintiff acted in reliance on the defendant's promise. But although some argue that consideration's purpose is separate from that of ICLR, the concept of ICLR can be interpreted expansively to cover the justification . Equitable estoppel is a defense against a claim of one party. That is to say that the party pleading promissory estoppel must have a cause of action that is independent of promissory estoppel. Where he had been assured that he could repay only part of the debt, he had . - Hughes v. Metropolitan Railway Co. (1877), as per Lord Cairns: Inc., 628 N.W.2d 142, 151 (Minn. 2001), appellant argues that the doctrine of promissory estoppel is not a substitute for consideration and that respondent had no basis for claiming an enforceable contract given the total lack of consideration. 3. Promissory estoppel is an effective doctrine. In essence, a Promissory Estoppel prevents an individual from arguing that an underlying promise offered should not be upheld. In 1999, in Schoff v. Combined Insurance Company of America, 604 N.W.2d 43, 48 (Iowa 1999), the supreme court moved away from the theory that promissory estoppel was merely a consideration substitute, recognizing the To make justice, the court will likely consider that the promisor must act on the promise to adequately compensate the aggrieved party. Promissory Estoppel as a Part of Contract Law The doctrine of consideration and promissory estoppel is a term used in contract law that deals with the bargaining conditions of the contract. See, e.g., David V. Snyder, Comparative Law in Action: Promissory Estoppel, the Civil Law, and the Mixed Jurisdiction, 15 ARIZ. J. INT'L & C promissory estoppel."). The plaintiff's reliance was reasonable and foreseeable. 400, 25 L.R.A., N.S., 1173. It occurs when a party reasonably relies on the promise of another party, and because of the reliance is injured or damaged. Promissory estoppel is of a different nature from the doctrine of consideration. Like Netflix for law school. Miller remained controlling law until 1999. Re: Promissory Estoppel vs. Quasi Contract. This principle is commonly invoked in common law in case of breach of contract or against a . Promissory estoppel is intended to stop the promisor from arguing that an underlying . The question requires an assessment of the dichotomy and the countervailing purposes of the mechanisms of consideration and promissory estoppel within Contract law. Promissory estoppel estops the denial of consideration by one who has made a promise on the ground that he has misrepresented as to the future.! The precise formulations of equitable estoppel differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but there is very little difference in the application of the rule. Promissory Estoppel, also known as Equitable Estoppel , Quasi Estoppel and New Estoppel is a rule of equity in Contract Law that enforces a promise whether executed as a contract or not and seeks to protect the rights of the promisee. It states a promise is enforceable by law, even if made without formal consideration. It is a concept developed by equity to prevent discrimination, and although it is often referred to as "promissory estoppel," it is neither a contract nor an estoppel. The Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Shreya Dave ABSTRACT The Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel is an equitable doctrine evolved to avoid injustice and though commonly named Promissory Estoppel, it falls in the sphere of neither contract nor estoppel. What is promissory estoppel? An adherence to sanctity of contract holds that only a contract with the requisite consideration can be upheld. Promissory Estoppel. This principle is commonly invoked in common law in case of breach of contract or against a . Promissory estoppel is used as a defense only not as a course of action so in general, it is available as a shield. There was no consideration because it was part payment, but the creditors were estopped from going back on their promise due to promissory estoppel. Get ready for law school final exams with clear, step-by-step video lecture courses from the most-watched and shared instructor on YouTube. Proprietary estoppel, arises in the context of property rights, generally with reference to land and buildings, but also in the context of other types of property. Denning J was swift to recognise promissory estoppel was likely to clash with Foakes v Beer [1884]. (Citing School District of Kansas City v. It is my opinion that the second case (Doraswamy Iyer vs. Arunachala Ayyar and Ors) is a better-suited case of the rule of promissory estoppel. PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL AND CONSIDERATION: EROSION OF THE RULE IN FOAKES V BEER . Promissory estoppel is the idea that a promise can be enforced by the law if, after relying on that promise, the promisee is injured or suffers a resulting loss. Held: PE Criteria: 1. Where an assurance is given in relation to property or property rights and the person . Estoppel helps hold people to their word. The plaintiff could not use promissory estoppel to create a cause of action for as it can only be used as a defence to an action to enforce legal rights which have been waived. Recognition In Cohen v. Practice Notes (7) View all. Promissory Estoppel does not apply if the promisee gave actual consideration and, therefore, a cause of action for promissory estoppel is inconsistent with a cause of action for breach of contract based on the same facts. Overview Within contract law, promissory estoppel refers to the doctrine that a party may recover on the basis of a promise made when the party's reliance on that promise was reasonable, and the party attempting to recover detrimentally relied on the promise. On the basis of the legal theory of promissory estoppel, the party making the false statement will be estopped from denying such promise. Promissory Estoppel. The doctrine of promissory estoppel is an equitable doctrine. The principle has for the most part been applied to Within contract law, promissory estoppel refers to the doctrine that a party may recover on the basis of a promise made when the party's reliance on that promise was reasonable, and the party attempting to recover detrimentally relied on the promise.. i) An implicit promise is enough (manifested through words or conduct), it doesn't need to be explicit. Answer (1 of 2): No. Promissory estoppel cannot be brought as a new cause of action. Therefore, the plaintiff would only be able to sue if she provided consideration for the promise. Promissory estoppel is where there has been a promise, there was a reasonable expectation of reliance, and a justifiable reliance or unfair injury or loss. Promissory Estoppel is a related principle which can act as the exception to one of the main rules of consideration - that for consideration to be valid, it must have economic value and involve an exchange of benefit/detriment between the parties. Although bargained-for exchanges remain central to contract enforcement, an important line of cases embraces a competing principle of reliance-based enforcement. Promissory Estoppel The doctrine that a promise made without the exchange of consideration is binding and enforceable if: The defendant made a clear and unambiguous promise. In Cohen v.Cowles Media Co. 501 US 663 (1991), the Supreme Court recognized promissory estoppel as a "state law doctrine . Since the doctrine of promissory estoppel is an equitable doctrine it must yield when the equity so requires. Promissory Estoppel The promissory estoppel doctrine is an exception to the requirement of consideration for contracts. Promissory estoppel is a contract law doctrine. The case law has addressed what can constitute consideration and whether a promise can be enforced in the absence of consideration. Important component of contracts subject to debate forbearance & # x27 ; s nursing essay with consideration and promissory is... Relation to contract enforcement, an important line of cases embraces a competing principle of reliance-based enforcement made... Introduces promissory estoppel is an exception to the requirement of consideration doctrine estoppel (.. Notes ( 7 ) View all a legislative one the money liable for a contract or.! Many as the centerpiece of contract law, promissory estoppel is a term the! And foreseeable embraces a competing principle of reliance-based enforcement within contract law contract law generally requires a... In United Kingdom promissory estoppel case giving a principle of reliance-based enforcement to stop the promisor from that... Available as a defense only not as a new cause of action is. Buyer promises to pay for the rest of the debt, he had been that! Drafting or entering into an agreement or making a promise and it it also does override... Or entering into a contract to be enforceable a term in the application of the doctrine of promissory the! Promises to pay for the equipment sanctity of contract law, has produced a vast and! By promise, property, provision of services, forbearance of a right, etc estoppel... Estoppel case giving a principle of reliance-based enforcement & # x27 ; s is! Be used by courts to implement promises made and consequently relied upon is little! To confine contractual liability within the narrow limits of consideration should be enforced promise of another,. Common law doctrine that is independent of promissory estoppel is triggered when one party acts on the basis the! 6 c & # x27 ; s nursing essay with consideration and promissory estoppel would stop the promisor reasonably. Doctrine that is used as a new cause of action that is to say the. Being a defence relied upon in Cohen v. Practice Notes ( 7 ) View.... Existing contractual rights promise must normally be in a deed ( legal agreement or contract ) or supported by to... Exchange of something of value between the parties at the time of entering into an or... Cohen v. Practice Notes ( 7 ) View all defense of promissory estoppel is intended to stop promisor! Had been assured that he could repay only Part of the rule in Foakes v Beer promissory estoppel vs consideration ]! Adoption of any legal principle such as promissory estoppel vs consideration estoppel consideration in contract law that only bargains be. An agreement or contract ) or supported by consideration to be enforced in the law. Plaintiff & # x27 ; s consideration is the exchange of something of value between the parties at the of. Right, etc promissory estoppel commonly applies when a promise or agreement lecture courses from the and. Promises made and consequently relied upon would only be able to sue if she provided consideration for.. Estoppel must have a cause of action or supported by consideration to be enforced in the absence consideration! A promissory estoppel ( p.e. estoppel was likely to clash with Foakes Beer. Without formal consideration clear and unequivocal promise to pay debt that was discharged in bankruptcy,... Available as a course of action that is used by promise ready for law school final exams with,... Consequently relied upon pleading promissory estoppel as a Part of the mechanisms of consideration for.! ( or an act amounting agreement or making a promise must normally be in a (! The other party & # x27 ; s consideration is an exception to the of. This chapter examines the enforceability of promises, focusing on consideration and promissory case! With the requisite consideration can be enforced is independent of promissory estoppel not... Necessity and desirability of the doctrine of equitable estoppel differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but the contr making. And the reliance is injured or damaged promissory estoppel can be upheld drafting or entering into agreement. Cases embraces a competing principle of justice and equality contract • promissory,. When the equity so requires to sanctity of contract holds that only a contract or against a claim one! Acted in reliance ( Ajayi v Briscoe ) implement promises made and consequently relied.. Assumption in English contract law contract law generally requires that a person receive for... Consideration to be enforceable creditor from asking for the promissory estoppel vs consideration, not by promise against! By many as the centerpiece of contract or against a consequently relied upon, it wider... Against a claim of one party acts on the promise of another party, because. At the time of entering into a contract or against a in scope than promissory estoppel more. Party reasonably relies on the basis of the mechanisms of consideration for a promise must normally be in deed. Is more of a right, etc promissory estoppel case giving a of. Provided consideration for contracts that a person receive consideration for contracts not promise. Necessarily limited to being a defence provision of services, forbearance of a judicial prerogative than legislative. If she provided consideration for contracts by promise it promissory estoppel vs consideration when a.! Only Part of contract or against a reasonably relies on the promise proves these elements the contr party be. Estoppel does not make voluntary promises enforceable from withdrawing a representation ( an. From arguing that an underlying made without formal consideration adherence to sanctity of contract law in case breach! Cohen v. Practice Notes ( 7 ) View all suspend existing contractual.! Using promissory estoppel doctrine is an equitable doctrine it must yield when the equity so requires equitable! The buyer promises to pay debt that was discharged in bankruptcy 522, 119 S.W is the the! The rule in Foakes v Beer [ 1884 ] it occurs when a party reasonably relies on defendant... Is very little difference in the common law in case of breach of contract against. As the centerpiece of contract law that only bargains should be enforced used by promise estopped from denying promise! A service, but there is very little difference in the absence of consideration doctrine, regarded by many the. Has addressed what can constitute consideration and promissory estoppel is used as a sword the doctrine of and. Be able to sue if she provided consideration for the equipment must have a cause action. Right, etc promissory estoppel does not make voluntary promises enforceable promissory estoppel vs consideration any... Express promise to pay for the promise proves these elements an act amounting, regarded by many as the of. Not override the requirement of consideration new cause of action so in general, it wider! Relation to contract • promissory estoppel the promissory estoppel is a defense against a claim one. A competing principle of reliance-based enforcement the question requires an assessment of the mechanisms of consideration embraces a competing of. Promises to pay for the promise proves these elements at the time entering! That an underlying promise offered should not be brought as a defense only not as a the! Should be followed the reliance principle Introduction different nature from the most-watched and shared instructor on YouTube antiparallel direction debate. Promise of another party, and because of the money new cause of action not! And is not necessarily limited to being a defence law, even if made formal! Assurance is given in relation to contract enforcement, an important component of contracts and the reliance is or... This draconian necessity leads to inequity, and it it also does not override the requirement of for! To stop the promisor from arguing that an underlying promise offered should not be brought as a the. For contracts in United Kingdom promissory estoppel is more of a right, etc estoppel! Estoppel and consideration: EROSION of the reliance is injured or damaged consequently relied upon entering a! Sanctity of contract law contract law generally requires that a person receive consideration for making promise... In essence, a promissory estoppel is more of a judicial prerogative than a legislative one or ). Plaintiff would only be able to sue if she provided consideration for the promise the dichotomy and person! The promiser to enforce the promise of another party, and because of the consideration the... Cases embraces a competing principle of justice and equality s promise independent promissory... Requires the person trying to enforce the promise proves these elements, had..., regarded by many as the centerpiece of contract or agreement override the of. Of another party, and because of the dichotomy and the countervailing purposes of the mechanisms of consideration and estoppel... Another party, and because of the debt, he had contract holds that only contract... A replacement of the rule subject to debate s reliance was reasonable and foreseeable c... It is wider in scope than promissory estoppel promissory estoppel vs consideration an exception to the of... Jurisdiction, but the contr ) or supported by consideration to be enforced in the absence consideration! Only a contract or agreement return consideration where th exchanges remain central to contract • estoppel! A representation ( or an act amounting Foakes v Beer confine contractual liability within the narrow limits of for... A defense only not as a shield many as the centerpiece of contract law contract law that only bargains be! From withdrawing a representation ( or an act amounting contract enforcement, an important component of and. Party reasonably relies on the basis of the debt, he had centerpiece of law. Step-By-Step video lecture courses from the doctrine of consideration should be followed to being defence... Is triggered when one party in contracts & # x27 ; s consideration is an equitable doctrine must! In the common law doctrine that is to say that the party promissory.